Residents, health group as condo associations to allow pets

Dave Rossman, Boca Raton Forum, Wednesday, June 17, 2009

 

Nanette Gordon lives in an East Boca condo with a no-pet policy that she said she finds quite absurd.

 

She now sits on the board of directors for Citizens for Pets in Condos, A Tamarac-based group seeking to change association policies prohibiting pet ownership.

 

“The health benefits, both physical and mental, of owning a pet cannot be disputed,” she said.  “Because of a minority of irresponsible pet owners, we all
have to suffer.”

 

Gordon’s health benefit argument was bolstered recently when Humana Insurance came on board and partnered with the grass-roots organization.

 

“At Humana, we’re dedicated to providing guidance to our members when they need it most, and in many cases that can be when folks would benefit from the
 companionship and affection a pet can provide,” said Humana Florida Senior Products CEO Michael Seltzer.

 

Gordon said the rationale against pet ownership typically centers on noise or neglectful owners not picking up waste.

 

“I can understand fines for irresponsible owners, but a total ban makes no sense,” he said.  “Also, I want cats, and I really don’t understand what harm a small,
indoor animal causes any neighbors.”

 

Renee Kellman splits time between New York and Cresthaven Villas in West Palm Beach and finds herself in a similar pet pickle.

 

“I lost my mother and brother in the span of eight months and have a range of health issues from fibromyalgia to high blood pressue,” Kellman said.
“I was told there can be no pets here, but when I arrived I saw several dogs.”

 

John Hart has been the president of Cresthaven’s Master Association since 2004 and said a few dogs were grandfathered in.

 

“It is true that two or three people had dogs, on of which sat on the board at the time, and they were allowed to stay in 2002,” Hart said.  “That person is no
longer on the board, and I agree that it is a bit unfair.”

 

The Department of Housing and Urban Development does stipulate that person with verifiable conditions documented by a physician, psychiatrist, social
worker or other mental health professional can have pets in no-pet areas.

 

“I would love to have a pet, too, but we have to consider the wisher of the to her 478 residents.  That said, we have met and decided she [Kellman] can keep
her dog provided it is kept in certain areas,” Hart said.

 

Kellman claims the stipulated areas are near a like with an alligator and that she is not confident that she will be able to keep her dog. 

 

The argument for pet ownership is not based solely on the owner, but advocates also note the benefit to the animal population.  “Not only do we help
 responsible pet owners and guardians keep their companion animals, but we also do our part to reduce the  huge number of perfectly adoptable animals who
 die needlessly in shelters each day,” said Maida Genser, president of Citizens for Pets in Condos.

 

Gordon drew parallels between other community restrictions that do not result in prohibitions of any kind.  “If a neighbor has a loud party or parks in an
assigned space, do we ban gatherings and parking?  No, we don’t.  We should certainly fine owners that do not pick up waste or whose pets are  anuisance,
but banning it entirely makes no sense,” she said.

 

Visit www.petsincondos.org