Too many condominiums discriminate based on pets*

The writer of Thursday's letter "Lady with dog forgets: Others have rights, too" would do well to remember that pet owners also have rights.

It is a matter of record that a majority of condominiums in South Florida have antiquated and illogical "no pets" rules in place, effectively barring thousands of people from purchasing a unit because they come accompanied by a cat or dog. Is this form of discrimination any less odious than that based on race, religion, color or sexual preference?

The writer clearly gives more weight to these silly "no pets" rules than she does to showing simple compassion to a neighbor in need.

DAVID SHAPIRO

South Palm Beach

Lady with dog forgets: Others have rights, too*

While reading Emily J. Minor's column about the condo lady with the dog, I felt the need to know why some people think that rules apply only to someone else ("Condo rules bite back after dog found in home," June 1).

I sympathize with the lady about her love for her dog and how it keeps her spirits up. When I bought my condo, however, I made sure that it did not allow pets. I don't even stay in motels that allow pets. Finally, I thought, I would not be subject to constant barking or dog doo all over the lawn. So don't my concerns amount to anything?

I agree that some of the condominium rules are silly, but they can be changed, if enough people agree. This woman broke the rules, which she was fully aware of before she bought her condo. There is no excuse to put her needs above those of her neighbors.

HELEN J. MILLER

Boynton Beach